Cases 51 - 60 of 211
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
GRIFFIN v. BONITA JOHNSON et al
as 2:2017cv04584
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD GRIFFIN
Defendant:
SYLVESTER BONITA JOHNSON, JEFFREY CHUJDIK, DANIEL J. BRADY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaus v. Pocono Mountain Regional Police Commission et al
as 3:2017cv01053
Plaintiff:
Gary Gaus
Defendant:
Pocono Mountain Regional Police Commission , David Moyer , Francis Depiano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
SARIN v. MAGEE et al
as 2:2017cv01492
Plaintiff:
TAJIN SARIN
Defendant:
MICHAEL MAGEE and FRANCIS PAWLOWSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caretti v. Doerr et al
as 4:2017cv00268
Plaintiff:
Francis Joseph Caretti, Jr.
Defendant:
Thomas J. Doerr, Jane Doe Doerr, Richard A. Goldinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dissinger v. Borough of Mahanoy City et al
as 1:2017cv00204
Plaintiff:
Michael Dissinger
Defendant:
Borough of Mahanoy City , Patricia A. Schnitzius , Thomas Maziekas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MCCARTHY et al v. SMOLINSKY et al
as 5:2017cv00028
Plaintiff:
SHEAMUS MCCARTHY and BRITTANY GALLUPPI
Defendant:
FRANCIS SMOLINSKY, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, ADRIAN SHCHUKA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOONE v. THE EEOC et al
as 2:2016cv06701
Plaintiff:
RICHARD FRANCIS BOONE
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, THE ARCHDIOCESE OF PHILADELPHIA- CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES and THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
