Cases 71 - 80 of 174
JACOBS v. BOROUGH OF LINDENWOLD et al
as 1:2016cv05376
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JACOBS
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF LINDENWOLD , LINDENWOLD POLICE DEPARTMENT , RONALD D. BURROWS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BETHEA v. DICKINSON
as 1:2016cv04142
Plaintiff:
QUINZELLE BETHEA
Defendant:
DOUGLAS DICKINSON and CAMDEN COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HICKS v. CAMDEN COUNTY et al
as 1:2016cv03436
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A HICKS, JR
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY, CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, METRODIVISION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
PERCELL v. REED et al
as 1:2016cv00519
Plaintiff:
RASHEEN PERCELL
Defendant:
PRINCE REED, NICHOLAS VOORHEES and CAMDEN COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al v. BEY
as 1:2015cv08222
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, CAMDEN MUNICIPAL COURT, CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Defendant:
NASIR EL RAZUL BEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MACKLIN v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2015cv07641
Plaintiff:
MALIKY MACKLIN
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN , CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT , JOHN SCOTT THOMSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
IGWE v. SMITH et al
as 1:2015cv07418
Plaintiff:
SALAHUDDIN IGWE
Defendant:
TAWAND SMITH, DETECTIVE JANE DOE, POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FINNEMEN v. JOHN DOE CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE OFFICER et al
as 1:2015cv07308
Plaintiff:
NASIR FINNEMEN
Defendant:
JOHN DOE CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE OFFICER and JOE HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05936
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
