Cases 81 - 90 of 167
WEBSTER v. NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE OFFICER CAHILL et al
as 3:2014cv07755
Plaintiff:
CHURVIN WEBSTER
Defendant:
NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE OFFICER CAHILL , SOMERSET COUNTY PROBATION OFFICER LORIE AURILLIO, CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SIMMONS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2014cv07205
Plaintiff:
ANDRE SIMMONS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON , CENTRAL RECEPTION AND ASSIGNMENT FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BELL v. JACKSON TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2014cv06259
Plaintiff:
JOHN BELL
Defendant:
JACKSON TOWNSHIP, MATTHEW D. KUNZ, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANDERS v. COUNTY OF ESSEX et al
as 2:2014cv05557
Plaintiff:
CHANELLE SANDERS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ESSEX , ESSEX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv04484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv02387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ABREU v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2014cv00716
Plaintiff:
DAVID ABREU
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN GIBERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv06214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv05960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DEAN v. DEPTFORD TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2013cv05197
Plaintiff:
TAHARQU DEAN
Defendant:
DEPTFORD TOWNSHIP, DANIEL MURPHY, GLOUCESTER COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
