Cases 81 - 90 of 102
CLARK v. PASSAIC COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2010cv06478
Plaintiff:
HAROLD CLARK
Defendant:
PASSAIC COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, GERALD SPEZIALE, JUAN PASSANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TROCHE v. CAMDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2010cv04288
Plaintiff:
JUAN R. TROCHE
Defendant:
CAMDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT , ARTURO VENEGAS, JR., KEVIN PARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SIENKIEWICZ et al v. CITY OF RAHWAY et al
as 2:2010cv03674
Plaintiff:
GARY SIENKIEWICZ and PATRICIA SIENKIEWICZ
Defendant:
CITY OF RAHWAY, RAHWAY POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN RODGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FERNANDEZ v. NATE et al
as 1:2010cv02840
Plaintiff:
JUAN FERNANDEZ
Defendant:
DANIEL NATE, NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, JOSEPH FUENTES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WIGGINS v. STRING et al
as 1:2010cv01710
Plaintiff:
JUAN WIGGINS
Defendant:
BRIAN STRING , JOE HANSEN, ANTHONY BENIGNO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
HEREDIA v. THE BOROUGH OF FREEHOLD et al
as 3:2009cv05966
Plaintiff:
JUAN HEREDIA
Defendant:
THE BOROUGH OF FREEHOLD, THE FREEHOLD BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHRISTOPHER OTLOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
RODRIGUEZ v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2009cv01909
Plaintiff:
JUAN RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANNE MILGRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
