Cases 1 - 10 of 482
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
DALNOKY v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2024cv06281
Plaintiff:
PAUL B. DALNOKY
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and THE NEW JERSEY COURT SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05966
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
MARCHISOTTO v. SANCHEZ et al
as 1:2024cv05870
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KUKU v. BOHLER et al
as 2:2024cv05694
Plaintiff:
ADEKUNLE KUKU
Defendant:
AUDREY BOHLER, CHIAKA OFUA, KARTRA CHARLEMAGNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CONTEH v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION
as 2:2024cv05689
Plaintiff:
ADAMA CONTEH
Defendant:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION d/b/a, STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
VERGARA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv05555
Defendant:
REGINA INEZ PEOPLES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Plaintiff:
LUIS EDUARDO VERGARA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
