Cases 1 - 10 of 14
WASHINGTON v. THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY et al
as 2:2024cv08597
Defendant:
OFFICER CHRISTIAN E. ORTIZ, CAPTAIN JASON E. FIELD, EMT HUNTER JACKMAN and others
Plaintiff:
COURTNIE WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bellinger v. THE CITY OF PERTH AMBOY et al
as 2:2024cv08442
Defendant:
PO JESSICA DEJESUS, THE CITY OF PERTH AMBOY, DET. BENJAMIN BATISTA and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Curtis Bellinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv06025
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COLETTE PETERS, RACHEL THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEJESUS v. DAVIS
as 3:2024cv00975
Plaintiff:
ALEXY DEJESUS
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER NIGEL I. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEJESUS v. COTTON et al
as 2:2022cv06107
Plaintiff:
ALEX DEJESUS
Defendant:
RICHARD COTTON, JOAQIN D. LIGUAS and ALLIANCE ONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DEJESUS v. DIVISION NEW JERSEY CIVIL RIGHTS et al
as 2:2021cv18413
Plaintiff:
ALEX DEJESUS
Defendant:
DIVISION NEW JERSEY CIVIL RIGHTS, ELIZABETH M RUSSIAW, WALESKA LUCAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSARIO v. JIMENEZ et al
as 2:2019cv16700
Plaintiff:
MARIO ROSARIO
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-30, CITY OF PERTH AMBOY POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER JESSICA DEJESUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSARIO v. Jimenez et al
as 2:2019cv16693
Plaintiff:
MARIO ROSARIO
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-30, CITY OF PERTH AMBOY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Officer Jessica DeJesus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv13822
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv12818
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
