Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv21598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
RODRIGUEZ v. DEJOY et al
as 2:2023cv03736
Plaintiff:
MARIA J RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
POSYMASTER GENERAL LOUIS DEJOY, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE AGENCY, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
FILS v. DEJOY et al
as 3:2023cv00699
Plaintiff:
STEVEN D. FILS
Defendant:
LOUIS DEJOY, POSTMASTER GENERAL and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
FILS v. DEJOY et al
as 3:2023cv00409
Plaintiff:
STEVEN FILS
Defendant:
LOUIS DEJOY, POSTMASTER GENERAL and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JONES v. DEJOY
as 2:2022cv04268
Plaintiff:
HARRIECE N. JONES and EMMA H
Defendant:
LOUIS DEJOY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv20396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
