Cases 1 - 10 of 12
HALL v. HICKS et al
as 2:2023cv01752
Plaintiff:
SIVAJI HALL
Defendant:
MARCUS O HICKS, BRUCE DAVIS, JAMES STIGLIANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NOLAN v. JACOBS et al
as 3:2022cv04860
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE NOLAN
Defendant:
JENNIFER LANGER JACOBS and SARAH ADELMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BERUTTI et al v. WOLFSON et al
as 2:2022cv04661
Plaintiff:
RONALD A. BERUTTI and MURRAY-NOLAN BERUTTI LLC
Defendant:
HONORABLE FREDA L. WOLFSON and WILLIAM T. WALSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
DAVIS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2022cv03755
Plaintiff:
CARLENE DAVIS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COUNTY OF ESSEX and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MURRAY-NOLAN v. RUBIN, et al
as 2:2022cv00801
Defendant:
GWYNETH K. MURRAY-NOLAN, SCOTT RUBIN, KURT PETSCHOW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SCHEID v. FEIGIN et al
as 1:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
JOSEPHINE SCHEID
Defendant:
GERALD A. FEIGIN, EMMANUEL RODRIGUEZ, HALEY MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv07257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
ANDERSON v. THE MERCER COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2011cv07620
Plaintiff:
GLORIA ANDERSON
Defendant:
THE MERCER COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, JOHN A. KEMLER, RICHARD PIOTROWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JACKSON v. SLAFF et al
as 2:2008cv06093
Plaintiff:
ZENAIDA N. JACKSON
Defendant:
SUSAN SLAFF, ROCHELLE SMITH, OFFICE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
