Cases 1 - 10 of 13
ECHO LAKE INVESTMENTS, LLC et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
ECHO LAKE INVESTMENTS, LLC and SYED NURUZZAMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JACQUELINE C. ROMERO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
BROOKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv02222
Plaintiff:
ANDRE R. BROOKS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JACQUELINE C. ROMERO and STEVEN M. DETTELBACH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PERRY et al v. PAOLILLO (ROMERO) et al
as 2:2022cv01872
Plaintiff:
AVERY MIGUEL PERRY, SR. and A.P., JR.
Defendant:
MICHELE PAOLILLO (ROMERO), BRIANNA PAOLILLO and MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv04702
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Romero v. Tobyhanna Township, PA et al
as 3:2019cv01038
Defendant:
Chief of Police Chris Wagner, Detective Lucas Bray, Detective Mark Webb and others
Plaintiff:
Emilio Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
TURNER v. SHIRLEY et al
as 2:2016cv03886
Plaintiff:
MARY VALESTINE MILLER TURNER
Defendant:
TERRY SHIRLEY, JON WILLIAMS, MANUEL ROMERO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROMERO v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
as 2:2013cv04247
Plaintiff:
JESUS ROMERO
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv07279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
