Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Me et al v. United States et al
as 2:2021cv19396
Plaintiff:
Jane Me, Jane Me1 and JON ROE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, U.S. DHS, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWMAN et al v. MOUNT LAUREL POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv05152
Plaintiff:
VANCE BOWMAN and SOL DIAZ
Defendant:
MOUNT LAUREL POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER C MCELROY, TROOPER RINALDI BADGE NO. 7063 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WINTERS v. KTG SYSTEMS, INC et al
as 1:2017cv00190
Defendant:
KTG SYSTEMS, INC , PAUL ZOLLINGER , ACCESS LABOR SERVICE, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
KYLE W. WINTERS and VANCE E. THORPE
Cross_claimant:
NIPRO GLASS AMERICAS
Cross_defendant:
ABC ENTITIES 1-100, ACCESS LABOR SERVICE, INC. , BYER'S ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
WATERS v. THE NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2015cv02842
Plaintiff:
EPHESIAN WATERS
Defendant:
THE NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, WILLIAM J. BRATTON, CYRUS R. VANCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. BOROUGH OF BELLMAWR et al
as 1:2013cv05437
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH WILSON
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF BELLMAWR, BOROUGH OF BROOKLAWN, CHARLES HOLLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VANCE v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY,DIVISION OF STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2012cv04006
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L VANCE
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY,DIVISION OF STATE POLICE and P KERRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
REDFORD et al v. ABRUTYN et al
as 2:2011cv05130
Plaintiff:
SAPHYRE REDFORD, DANIELLE BITON and CHARLENE MICHELLE BITON
Defendant:
MORGAN MELHUISH ABRUTYN, ED DWECK, KATHLEEN CARLA ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
