Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 91 - 98 of 98
RAMOS v. LAMPOGNA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00483
Plaintiff: ANGEL RAMOS
Defendant: BETHANY LAMPOGNA, ESQ., ALEXANDER STILTON, STANLEY ROLLERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMOS v. STIRTON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00341
Plaintiff: ANGEL RAMOS
Defendant: ALEXANDER STIRTON, BETHANY ZAMPOGNA, STANLEY ROLLERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMOS v. STIRTON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00342
Plaintiff: ANGEL RAMOS
Defendant: ALEXANDER STIRTON, BETHANY ZAMPOGNA, STANLEY ROLLERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMOS v. ROLLERSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00340
Plaintiff: ANGEL RAMOS
Defendant: STANLEY ROLLERSON, ALEXANDER STIRTON, ESQ., BETHANY LAMPOGNA, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMOS-VAZQUEZ v. WAGNER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv00364
Plaintiff: JOSE M. RAMOS-VAZQUEZ
Defendant: GEORGE WAGNER, MARTIN and GUESSNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Oakes et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00157
Plaintiff: Jose Enrique Ramos
Defendant: Correctional Officer J. Oakes, Correctional Officer J Cherry, Huntington State Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Holt
as 3:2007cv02057
Petitioner: Michael Ramos
Respondent: Ronnie Holt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramos v. Lawler et al
as 4:2007cv01917
Petitioner: Charles Ramos
Respondent: Raymond Lawler and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?