Cases 21 - 30 of 50,315
Gill v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00922
Petitioner:
Joseph Gill
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sedlak v. USA
as 1:2024cv00913
Petitioner:
Roger Sedlak
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brooks v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00914
Petitioner:
Michael Brooks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rodriquez v. LSCI-Allenwood
as 3:2024cv00920
Petitioner:
Thomas Phillip Rodriquez
Respondent:
Warden of LSCI-Allenwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Zierke v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00919
Plaintiff:
Gary Zierke
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
BAUR v. MCGINLEY et al
as 2:2024cv02421
Petitioner:
BRIAN D. BAUR
Respondent:
TOM MCGINLEY, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and MICHELLE A. HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MILLER v. SUPERINTENDENT SCI GREENE et al
as 2:2024cv02391
Petitioner:
STEVEN MILLER
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT SCI GREENE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA and MICHELLE HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NASH v. PHILA DISTRICT ATTY et al
as 2:2024cv02437
Plaintiff:
AASIM NASH
Defendant:
PHILA DISTRICT ATTY, PHILA PUB. DEF. and NEW VITAE DR. BEHR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLIOTT v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2024cv02426
Plaintiff:
JAMIE ELLIOTT
Defendant:
RANITA DAVIS, KIM DAVIS, MICHAEL SEADOG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2024cv02428
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN TERRELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
DANIELS, WALSTON and SURGI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
