Cases 31 - 40 of 74
HERNANDEZ v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07295
Plaintiff:
MILAGRO HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERNANDEZ v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06464
Plaintiff:
ISMAEL HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERNANDEZ v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06425
Plaintiff:
REYNALDO HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VELAZQUEZ-HERNANDEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv04512
Petitioner:
HECTOR VELAZQUEZ-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HERNANDEZ v. MASON et al
as 1:2016cv03922
Petitioner:
ARNULFO SANCHEZ HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
L. MASON and DAVID ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HERNANDEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv03712
Petitioner:
WILLIAM HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HOOKS v. PIERCE et al
as 1:2016cv03300
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE D HOOKS
Defendant:
RICK PIERCE, ELLIOT HERNANDEZ and L SANTIAGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERNANDEZ-RIVERA v. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2016cv00551
Petitioner:
OMAR R HERNANDEZ-RIVERA
Respondent:
J. HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
AHMAD v. HUDSON COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE NARCOTICS TASK FORCE et al
as 2:2015cv08994
Plaintiff:
MUSADDIQ AHMAD
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE NARCOTICS TASK FORCE, NORMAN DOUGLAS GLOVER, JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SLAUGHTER et al v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2015cv08327
Plaintiff:
CHARLES S. SLAUGHTER, THOMAS LIDDELL, SHANE SIMPSON and others
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, STEPHEN SWEENEY, VINCENT PRIETO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
