Cases 31 - 40 of 272
Nguyen v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2008cv01665
Petitioner:
Loc Tien Nguyen
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Thomas Decker and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SALEH v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT et al
as 2:2008cv04441
Petitioner:
HASSAN AHMED SALEH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SANTOS-RUIZ et al v. CHERTOFF et al
as 3:2008cv04352
Petitioner:
GIOBANNI SANTOS-RUIZ
Respondent:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, MIDDLESEX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS and EDMOND CICCHI
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ALCANTARA v. CHERTOFF
as 1:2008cv04302
Petitioner:
BERNARDO ANTONIO ALCANTARA
Respondent:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
DAVIS v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2008cv04266
Petitioner:
DAVID ORLANDO DAVIS
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY and MICHAEL CHERTOFF
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv03889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
DESAI v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2008cv04066
Plaintiff:
UTPAL DESAI
Defendant:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, SCOTT WEBER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
GIL v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2008cv04064
Petitioner:
GUILLERMO ALVAREZ GIL
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY and MICHAEL CHERTOFF
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ADEKOYA II v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv03994
Plaintiff:
PRINCE A.Z.K. ADEKOYA II
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, CHRISTOPHER SHANAHAN, R. LOPEZ and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv03985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
