Cases 31 - 40 of 137
SANDERS v. CAMDEN NEW JERSEY
as 1:2018cv13641
Defendant:
CAMDEN NEW JERSEY
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SANDERS, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSS v. GHAEDI et al
as 3:2018cv12923
Defendant:
PSYCHOLOGIST DIANA SCHMIDT, KAVEH GHAEDI, D.O. and TREVOR RUDGE, M.D.
Plaintiff:
OMAR J. ROSS, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSS v. PFEFFER et al
as 1:2018cv08549
Plaintiff:
OMAR J. ROSS, SR.
Defendant:
JENNIFER PFEFFER, VOA-VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA PROMISE PROGRAM, RUTGERS UNIVERSITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CORRECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYES v. ORTIZ
as 1:2017cv06459
Petitioner:
MICHAEL E. HAYES, SR.
Respondent:
DAVID E. ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BAKER v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 3:2017cv04995
Petitioner:
BRANDON S. BAKER, SR.
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. PIERCE et al
as 1:2017cv02961
Petitioner:
BRYANT BANKS, SR.
Respondent:
DAVID PIERCE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROSS v. NJ DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv01921
Plaintiff:
OMAR J. ROSS, SR.
Defendant:
NJ DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NORTHERN STATE PRISON, GEORGE O. ROBINSON, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMWRIGHT v. NO DEFENDANT LISTED
as 1:2016cv08609
Plaintiff:
DENNIS J. HAMWRIGHT, SR.
Defendant:
NO DEFENDANT LISTED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv08266
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WILLAMS, SR.
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAINEY v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv08088
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER L. GAINEY, SR.
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.