Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Shelton v. Bledsoe et al
as 3:2011cv01618
Plaintiff:
Norman Shelton
Defendant:
Brian A. Bledsoe, Thomas R. Kane, Joseph Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
SHELTON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM (PPS) et al
as 2:2011cv04959
Plaintiff:
JULIAN SHELTON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM (PPS), CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY (CFCF) and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARRETT v. WAGNER et al
as 5:2011cv01888
Plaintiff:
KAREEM GARRETT
Defendant:
GEORGE WAGNER, KEVIN BARNHARDT, FRANCO TASSONE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Bledsoe et al
as 4:2011cv00368
Plaintiff:
Norman N Shelton
Defendant:
Warden Bledsoe, A. W. Young, Trate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SIMPSON v. CHESTER COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2010cv00905
Plaintiff:
CHALMERS A. SIMPSON
Defendant:
CHESTER COUNTY PRISON, JACK HEALY, KAREN/SHELTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELL v. EHRLICH et al
as 2:2010cv00289
Plaintiff:
DARRYL A. BELL, SR.
Defendant:
CHARLES EHRLICH, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY and FINCOURT B. SHELTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Reese
as 3:2009cv02418
Plaintiff:
Shelton Smith
Defendant:
Lt. Reese
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Chester County Prison et al
as 1:2009cv02223
Plaintiff:
Chalmers A. Simpson
Defendant:
Chester County Prison, Jack Healy, Karen/Shelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Berks
as 3:2009cv02174
Plaintiff:
Shelton Smith
Defendant:
Dr. Berks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOGAN v. TAYLOR et al
as 2:2009cv05049
Plaintiff:
SHELTON LOGAN
Defendant:
ROBIN TAYLOR and DENNIS POWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
