Cases 41 - 50 of 124
TORMASI v. HAYMAN et al
as 3:2008cv04950
Plaintiff:
WALTER A. TORMASI
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HAYMAN, JAMES BARBO, MICHELLE RICCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NYHOLM, 2ND v. PRYCE et al
as 1:2008cv04824
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. NYHOLM, 2ND
Defendant:
PRYCE, MEKENTCO, ROLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WERNER v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 3:2008cv04663
Plaintiff:
KEITH A. WERNER
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, ALLAN B. MARTIN, ABU AHSAN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HASHER v. HAYMAN et al
as 2:2008cv04105
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HASHER
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HAYMAN, JENNIFER VELEZ, BERNARD GOODWIN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DAVIDSON v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv03580
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. DAVIDSON
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., JOHN HOCHBERG, HERBERT SMYZECK and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MILLER v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2008cv03014
Plaintiff:
BRYAN MILLER
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON and C.M.S. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BARNES v. SHERRER et al
as 2:2008cv02420
Plaintiff:
HASSAN BARNES
Defendant:
LYDELL B. SHERRER, BRUCE A. HAUCK, PIERRE EMMANUAL and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GORDON v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 1:2008cv02032
Plaintiff:
WILLIE J. GORDON
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HICKSON v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 1:2008cv01982
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HICKSON
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES and LYDIA ARMSTEAD
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BREWER v. HAYMAN et al
as 1:2008cv01208
Plaintiff:
DANIEL S. BREWER
Defendant:
GEORGE HAYMAN, KATHERINE MACFARLAND, DARLENE DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
