Cases 51 - 60 of 88
MILES v. POWELL et al
as 1:2018cv10397
Plaintiff:
ALIM T. MILES
Defendant:
JOHN POWELL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS and MEDICAL STAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2018cv09591
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILSON
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, GARY LANIGAN, JOHN POWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WAGHER v. POWELL
as 3:2018cv05109
Petitioner:
JOSEPH CHARLE WAGHER
Respondent:
JOHN POWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SHELLY v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2018cv02682
Petitioner:
JAMAAL SHELLY
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and JOHN POWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROMEO v. POWELL et al
as 1:2018cv00056
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN ROMEO
Defendant:
JOHN POWELL and BAYSIDE STATE PRISON MEDICAL STAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAY v. POWELL et al
as 1:2017cv06474
Petitioner:
ERIC GRAY
Respondent:
JOHN POWELL and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NEAL v. POWELL et al
as 1:2017cv04768
Plaintiff:
MILTON NEAL
Defendant:
JOHN POWELL, D. WOOLSON, S. TRACEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LISA v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2017cv02880
Petitioner:
PETER LISA
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and JOHN POWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anthony Fox v. Bayside State Prison, et al
as 17-1707
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY FOX
Defendant - Appellee:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RUTGERS UNIVERSITY and others
HOLMES v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2017cv02160
Plaintiff:
VERNICE CLARK HOLMES
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BAYSIDE STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
