Cases 51 - 60 of 645
Bellamy v. Sage
as 1:2023cv00379
Petitioner:
Eric Moore Bellamy
Respondent:
Warden Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KITTRELL v. SMITH et al
as 2:2023cv00811
Plaintiff:
ANDRE KITTRELL
Defendant:
BARRY SMITH, LIEUTENANT OLIVER, JEFF MEASE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robbins v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Vernon D.K. Robbins and Vernon D.F. Robbins
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Dorina Varner, Keri Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Miller et al
as 1:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
Joshua I. Payne
Defendant:
Ross C. Miller, Correctional Officer Timpe, C. Srebro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Hutchinson
as 4:2023cv00205
Petitioner:
Corey Moore
Respondent:
Warden Hutchinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Edwards et al v. Rivello et al
as 1:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Edwards, John Hightower, Muwsa Green and others
Defendant:
J. Rivello, A. Wakefield, N. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. HALLMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
KARLESTER YOUNG
Defendant:
KIP HALLMAN, PAUL NOEL, JOHN OR JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moton v. Garman et al
as 1:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Myron Moton
Defendant:
Mr. Garman, Deputy Houser, Mr. Vangorder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GONZALEZ v. SREBRO et al
as 1:2022cv02033
Plaintiff:
Manuel Gonzalez
Defendant:
Ms. C. Srebro, L. Harry, Keri Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GONZALEZ v. SREBRO et al
as 2:2022cv04962
Plaintiff:
MANUEL GONZALEZ
Defendant:
C. SREBRO, L. HARRY, KERI MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
