Cases 71 - 80 of 367
PERSAUD v. SHANAHAN et al
as 2:2012cv04544
Petitioner:
PATRICK PERSAUD
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER SHANAHAN, WAYNE MULLER, JANET NAPOLITANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MEDINA-VALDEZ v. HENDRICKS et al
as 2:2012cv04486
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO MEDINA-VALDEZ
Respondent:
ROY L. HENDRICKS, MARCOS CASTRO, JANET NAPOLITANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GUERRA v. TSOUKARIS et al
as 2:2012cv04478
Petitioner:
MARIO GUERRA
Respondent:
JOHN TSOUKARIS, ROY HENDRICKS, JOHN MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LYNVAL v. HENDRICKS et al
as 2:2012cv04264
Petitioner:
LYNVAL GEORGE REECE
Respondent:
ROY HENDRICKS, JOHN TSOUKARIS, JOHN MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NDRECAJ v. HOLDER, JR. et al
as 3:2012cv04176
Petitioner:
GJON NDRECAJ
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER, JR., JANET NAPOLITANO, CHRISTOPHER SHANAHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MARTIN v. ELWOOD et al
as 3:2012cv04022
Petitioner:
MATTHEW J. MARTIN
Respondent:
BRIAN ELWOOD, MONMOUTH COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY FREEHOLD, NEW JERSEY, SCOTT A. WEBER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ESPANA-VELIZ v. HENDRICKS et al
as 2:2012cv04063
Petitioner:
MAYNOR ESPANA-VELIZ
Respondent:
ROY L. HENDRICKS, JANET NAPOLITANO , SAM A. DOTRO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MALCOLM v. HENDRICKS et al
as 2:2012cv04009
Petitioner:
CARL ANTHONY MALCOLM
Respondent:
ROY L. HENDRICKS, JOHN TSOUKARIS, JANET NAPOLITANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NWOZUZU v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 3:2012cv03963
Petitioner:
KELECHI GERALD NWOZUZU
Respondent:
JANET NAPOLITANO , ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. , JOHN T. MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
