Cases 81 - 90 of 233
NEALS v. WARREN et al
as 3:2013cv04398
Petitioner:
TIVON E. NEALS
Respondent:
CHARLES WARREN and JOHN J. HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THOMPSON v. WARREN et al
as 3:2013cv04334
Plaintiff:
RICHARD THOMPSON
Defendant:
CHARLES WARREN, KENNETH NELSEN, JIMMY BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. WARREN
as 2:2013cv04304
Petitioner:
YUSEF ALLEN
Respondent:
CHARLES WARREN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PETERSON v. WARREN et al
as 2:2013cv04250
Petitioner:
WILLIE PETERSON
Respondent:
CHARLES WARREN and JOHN HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stephen Downer v. Charles Warren, et al
as 13-2974
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN DOWNER
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES WARREN and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
SEABROOKS v. WARREN et al
as 3:2013cv03703
Petitioner:
EUGENE SEABROOKS
Respondent:
CHARLES WARREN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEWIS v. WARREN et al
as 3:2013cv03705
Petitioner:
MALVERN L. LEWIS
Respondent:
CHARLES WARREN and JEFFREY CHIESA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tormu Prall v. Supreme Court, et al
as 13-2313
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION NEW JERSEY, SUPERIOR COURT and others
NICHOLS v. WARREN, et al.
as 1:2013cv02897
Petitioner:
DAVON NICHOLS
Respondent:
CHARLES WARREN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TUCKER v. WARREN
as 3:2013cv02908
Petitioner:
MICHAEL TUCKER
Respondent:
CHARLES WARREN, JR. and ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
