Cases 1 - 10 of 132
WOODWARD v. TREJO et al
as 1:2024cv02660
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WOODWARD
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TREJO, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ALVERADO, SERGEANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON JR. et al v. MCGILL et al
as 2:2023cv20535
Plaintiff:
CHARLES B. ANDERSON JR., JOSE N.M.I. VALENTINE, ISAAC JERDAN and others
Defendant:
PATRICIA MCGILL, MR. SIMS, M. BRANTLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. HUGHES et al
as 3:2023cv03116
Plaintiff:
SHAWN LEWIS
Defendant:
BRIAN HUGHES, ROBERT PARRISH and CHARLES ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANSEVERO v. COUNTY OF MERCER et al
as 3:2022cv01977
Plaintiff:
DANE SANSEVERO
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MERCER, MR. BRIAN HUGHES, WARDEN CHARLES ELLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COWAN v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2022cv01167
Plaintiff:
TAQUAN COWAN
Defendant:
CHARLES ELLIS and BRIAN M. HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
JERMINE JONES
Defendant:
CHARLES ELLIS and BRIAN M. HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCRACKEN v. COUNTY OF UNION NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2021cv20268
Plaintiff:
TED MCCRACKEN
Defendant:
COUNTY OF UNION NEW JERSEY, CORRECTION OFFICER HOLMES, VICTORIA L. KUHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEJESUS v. COUNTY OF MERCER et al
as 3:2021cv20233
Plaintiff:
PEDRO DEJESUS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MERCER, BRIAN HUGHES, CHARLES ELLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2021cv20161
Plaintiff:
RAHEEN D. WILSON, SR.
Defendant:
WARDEN CHARLES ELLIS, MEDICAL DEPT. STAFF, NURSE NANCY GORDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. HUGHES et al
as 3:2021cv20147
Plaintiff:
RAHEEN D. WILSON, SR.
Defendant:
BRIAN M. HUGHES and WARDEN CHARLES ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
