Cases 1 - 10 of 50
MARTINEZ v. HUDSON COUNTY JAIL AND REHABILITATION CENTER et al
as 2:2022cv04804
Plaintiff:
SEAN C. MARTINEZ
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY JAIL AND REHABILITATION CENTER, WELL PATH MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOE OFFICERS 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shue v. Scism et al
as 1:2012cv00448
Plaintiff:
Peter Shue
Defendant:
William Scism, Brian Feltman, Jerry C. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Foster v. Raleigh et al
as 3:2010cv01804
Plaintiff:
Derrick L. Foster
Defendant:
Jeffrey S. Raleigh, Jerry C. Martinez, A. D. Tollackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryce v. Martinez
as 3:2009cv02195
Petitioner:
Ewan Bryce
Respondent:
Jerry C. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01859
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cargill v. Martinez
as 4:2009cv01822
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Cargill
Respondent:
Jerry C. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Serrano v. Martinez
as 3:2009cv01826
Petitioner:
Jan L. Serrano
Respondent:
Jerry C. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Webb v. Martinez et al
as 3:2009cv01824
Petitioner:
Tyrone Egbert Webb
Respondent:
Jerry C. Martinez and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Buscemi v. Martinez et al
as 3:2009cv01664
Petitioner:
Gregory Buscemi
Respondent:
Jerry C. Martinez and Jerry C. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bryce v. Martinez et al
as 3:2009cv01627
Petitioner:
Ewan Bryce
Respondent:
Jerry C. Martinez and LSCI Allenwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
