Cases 1 - 10 of 80
GAINES v. LANGE et al
as 1:2023cv21315
Plaintiff:
VAUGHN E. GAINES
Defendant:
HONORABLE PETER LANGE, CHERLY COHEN and TIMOTHY FARROW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARDISON v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2022cv06017
Petitioner:
KYE T. HARDISON
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, GERALDINE COHEN, TODD E. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBINSON v. NEIL et al
as 1:2022cv01050
Plaintiff:
ALBERT THEODORE ROBINSON
Defendant:
DR JAMES NEIL, CHARLES MOOR WARREN, KRISTINA SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GOFF-COHEN v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2021cv00966
Defendant:
MCCI, MONMOUTH COUNTY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Plaintiff:
TAMMY GOFF-COHEN, SHAQUASTA BULTS, KELLY TOMISIK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOFF-COHEN v. WU et al
as 3:2021cv00965
Defendant:
PHD SUSIE CHUNG, EDWIN WU, SUSIE CHUNG, PHD and others
Plaintiff:
TAMMY GOFF-COHEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOFF-COHEN v. GOD
as 2:2020cv20420
Plaintiff:
TAMMY GOFF-COHEN
Defendant:
GOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOFF-COHEN v. GOD
as 3:2020cv20420
Defendant:
GOD
Plaintiff:
TAMMY GOFF-COHEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOFF-COHEN v. COHEN et al
as 3:2020cv15688
Defendant:
JUDGE JAMES M. NEWMAN, SILVIA BRIETOWICH, SUSAN UNGER COHEN and others
Plaintiff:
TAMMY GOFF-COHEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. COHEN et al
as 1:2020cv07249
Plaintiff:
DANNY SMITH
Defendant:
LESLIE MCNAIR-JACKSON and JILL R. COHEN, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKS v. CFG HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 1:2019cv21984
Defendant:
GERALDINE COHEN, CHERYL DUBOIS, CFG HEALTH SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL PARKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
