Cases 1 - 10 of 11
ZIGLER v. WARREN et al
as 1:2021cv19474
Plaintiff:
JAMES ZIGLER
Defendant:
CHARLES WARREN, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HUFF and CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYWARD v. BATON et al
as 1:2021cv16375
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HAYWARD, JR.
Defendant:
OFFICER BATON, OFFICER FORREST, NURSE ABBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MACDONALD v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2021cv04518
Defendant:
SGT. RAGIOLA, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MARTIN, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HUFF and others
Plaintiff:
FREDRICK M. MACDONALD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUFF v. ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY
as 1:2020cv09761
Defendant:
ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY
Plaintiff:
MARK D. HUFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARRETT v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2017cv02924
Plaintiff:
ALAN D. GARRETT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY, JEROME B. SIMANDLE, MAGGIE F. MOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUFF v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv05857
Plaintiff:
GREGORY HUFF
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUFF v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03678
Petitioner:
BYRAM K. HUFF
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HUFF v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv02296
Petitioner:
BYRAM K. HUFF
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HUFF v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv08117
Petitioner:
BYRAM K. HUFF
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
STEVENSON v. THE OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR OF MONMOUTH COUNTY et al
as 3:2013cv07143
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY E. STEVENSON
Defendant:
THE OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR OF MONMOUTH COUNTY, FORMER MONMOUTH COUNTY PROSECUTOR, PETER E. WARSHAW JR., ACTING MONMOUTH COUNTY PROSECUTOR, CHRISTOPHER J. GRAMICCIONI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
