Cases 1 - 10 of 54
MALOUF v. TURNER et al
as 1:2012cv02555
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. MALOUF
Defendant:
NICOLETTA TURNER-FOSTER, STEVEN SPOULDING, HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KITCHEN v. GRONDOLSKY et al
as 1:2011cv05834
Plaintiff:
JAMES MICHAEL KITCHEN
Defendant:
JEFF GRONDOLSKY, DONNA ZICKEFOOSE, ROBERT DONAHUE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willie Goodman v. Jeff Grondolsky
as 11-1334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE L. GOODMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFF GRONDOLSKY
THOMAS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2009cv06170
Petitioner:
DON THOMAS
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER, ROD ROSENSTEIN and JEFF GRONDOLSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gadson v. Grondolsky et al
as 1:2009cv00915
Plaintiff:
Robert V. Gadson
Defendant:
Jeff Grondolsky, Michael K. Loucks, Mark J. Grady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOODMAN v. GRONDOLSKY
as 1:2009cv05371
Petitioner:
WILLIE L. GOODMAN
Respondent:
JEFF GRONDOLSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TOOLASPRASHAD v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv05335
Plaintiff:
LATCHMIE TOOLASPRASHAD
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, KATHLEEN M. KENNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
SANCHEZ v. GRONDOLSKY
as 1:2009cv05272
Petitioner:
DEDMAS SANCHEZ
Respondent:
JEFF GRONDOLSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NAVA v. GRONDOLSKY et al
as 1:2009cv04900
Petitioner:
NAVA MANUEL NAVA
Respondent:
JEFF GRONDOLSKY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HOFFENBERG v. GRONDOLSKY et al
as 1:2009cv04784
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JUDE HOFFENBERG
Defendant:
JEFF GRONDOLSKY, RICHARD HERBIK, ROBIN HOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
