Cases 1 - 10 of 19
JACKSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv03527
Plaintiff:
DANTE JACKSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CORIZON HEALTH INC., CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LISA CRESPO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVILA v. PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION P.D.P. et al
as 2:2018cv00774
Plaintiff:
BASILIO DAVILA
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION P.D.P., BLANCHE CARNEY, ROBERT L. TOMASZEWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv03892
Plaintiff:
DANTE JACKSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, WATKINS, KAREN BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOODSON v. BRYANT et al
as 2:2016cv02345
Plaintiff:
RUDOLPH WOODSON, JR.
Defendant:
KAREN BRYANT, MEDICAL STAFF, DENTAL STAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KELTY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv00306
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO KELTY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LOUIS GIORLA, KAREN BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES v. BRYANT et al
as 2:2015cv06883
Plaintiff:
KENNY JAMES
Defendant:
KAREN BRYANT, T.M. JONES, LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAHMAN v. BRYANT
as 2:2015cv06063
Petitioner:
OMAR A. RAHMAN
Respondent:
KAREN BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MAGWOOD v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv04294
Plaintiff:
THEODORE MAGWOOD
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LOUIS GIORLA, KAREN BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOISEAU v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv04010
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW LOISEAU
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LOUIS GIORLA, KAREN BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALBERT v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2015cv03229
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
LOUIS GIORLA, CLYDE GAINEY, MICHELE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
