Cases 1 - 10 of 36
IN RE: MOATS
as 2:2023cv00614
In Re:
BRADLEY MOATS
Defendant:
BRUCE MCDONNEL and HARREL MASON, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOPEZ et al v. MORRISON et al
as 1:2022cv06607
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN P. LOPEZ and JAMES A. EDWARDS
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER MORRISON and NICHOLAS MCDONNELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOPEZ et al v. CEO OF ANCORA PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2022cv06205
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN P. LOPEZ, JAMES A. EDWARDS, JOHN DOES 1-500 and others
Defendant:
CEO OF ANCORA PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL, NICHOLAS MCDONNELL, CHIEF OF HUMAN SERVICES POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEMBY v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2020cv13892
Defendant:
EDWARD T. MCDONNELL, COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CITY OF CAMDEN and others
Plaintiff:
JAMOR J. DEMBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. WILLINGBORO TOWNSHIP NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2020cv01114
Defendant:
LINDA A. HYNES, DETECTIVE BRANDON WHITHAM, DEPUTY CT. ADMIN. TASHESIA HICKMOND and others
Plaintiff:
RUFUS WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREEMAN v. MCDONNELL
as 3:2018cv07802
Plaintiff:
DONELL FREEMAN
Defendant:
KEVIN MCDONNELL, MD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GITTENS v. SCHOLTZ et al
as 1:2018cv02519
Plaintiff:
DARIUS GITTENS
Defendant:
MILDRED SCHOLTZ, MATTHEW LEITH, W. MCDONNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv12196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv12196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2017cv02180
Plaintiff:
Marcellus Jones
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Shirley Smeal, Michael Wenerowicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
