Cases 1 - 10 of 21
SZEMPLE v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE INC. et al
as 3:2013cv06087
Plaintiff:
CRAIG FRANCIS SZEMPLE
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE INC., ART BREWER, Y. SOLIMAN, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SZEMPLE v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE INC. et al
as 3:2013cv01058
Plaintiff:
CRAIG FRANCIS SZEMPLE
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE INC., UNIVERSITY MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY, UCHC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SZEMPLE v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE INC. et al
as 3:2011cv00383
Plaintiff:
CRAIG FRANCIS SZEMPLE
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE INC., UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY, UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juan Vazquez v. David Ragonese, et al
as 10-1778
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUAN M. VAZQUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID M. RAGONESE, DEVON BROWN, KATHERINE IRELAND and others
Edwin Lorenzo v. T. Michael Power, et al
as 09-3264
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWIN LORENZO
Defendant - Appellee:
T. MICHAEL POWER, Administrator, at East Jersey State Prison and MARY R. JULIANO
Juan Vazquez v. David Ragonese, et al
as 09-2868
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUAN M. VAZQUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID M. RAGONESE, DEVON BROWN, KATHERINE IRELAND and others
Andrew Rhett v. T. Power
as 09-2842
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW RHETT
Defendant - Appellee:
T. MICHAEL POWER, et al.
Charles Sonntag v. Michael Powers, et al
as 09-1388
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES SONNTAG
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL POWERS, Administrator and STATE OF NJ
Juan Vazquez v. Devon Brown, et al
as 09-1356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUAN M. VAZQUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
DEVON BROWN, KATHERINE IRELAND, RAYFORD JOHNSON and others
Charles Sonntag v. Michael Powers, et al
as 09-1073
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES SONNTAG
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL POWERS, Administrator and STATE OF NJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
