Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Walker v. Anders et al
as 3:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Michael Walker
Defendant:
N.W. Anders, C. Pittsinger, Ms. Sheffield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Walker v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 23-2744
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT COAL TOWNSHIP SCI
Michael Walker v. Superintendent Benner Township SCI, et al
as 22-2693
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT BENNER TOWNSHIP SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Walker v. Baldauf
as 3:2022cv00713
Plaintiff:
Michael Walker
Defendant:
P.A. Fawn Lynn Baldauf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Walker, et al v. Wetzel, et al
as 22-1357
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL WALKER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MAURICE PEARSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of Corrections
Walker et al v. The Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv01608
Defendant:
Jill Spylher, Paula Price, A. Scalia and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Walker and Maurice Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker et al v. The Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv01608
Defendant:
Jill Spylher, Paula Price, A. Scalia and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Walker and Maurice Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. USA
as 3:2019cv02015
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Walker v. Bell et al
as 3:2019cv01297
Defendant:
Russella Jo. Bell, Craig Northrop, D. Earnest and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. MARSH et al
as 5:2019cv02832
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and RICHARD MARSH
Petitioner:
MICHAEL WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
