Cases 1 - 9 of 9
RATLIFF v. DETECTIVE MICHAEL GETTLER et al
as 2:2023cv03373
Plaintiff:
EDWARD RATLIFF
Defendant:
DETECTIVE MICHAEL GETTLER and TRENTON N.J. POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acevedo v. Brittain et al
as 3:2023cv00546
Plaintiff:
Alberto Acevedo
Defendant:
Kathy Brittain, A.M. Walter and N.J. Forte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAMIAS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2015cv04008
Plaintiff:
SAMMY PAMIAS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE, FEDERAL DEFENDERS DISTRICT OF N.J. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WINFIELD v. C.F.C.F. DETENTION CENTER et al
as 2:2013cv06154
Plaintiff:
CLAYTON WINFIELD
Defendant:
C.F.C.F. DETENTION CENTER, SUSAN BOLAND, PENNSYLVANIA PROBATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BUIE v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX N.J. et al
as 2:2012cv04236
Petitioner:
DAVID A. BUIE
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX N.J. and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
A.K.A. JUSTICE v. THE CRIMINAL SYSTEMS OF N.J., S.C. et al
as 2:2012cv02662
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SINGLETON
Defendant:
THE CRIMINAL SYSTEMS OF N.J., S.C. and THE P.T.S. EXTRADITION COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parichuk v. SCI Dallas et al
as 3:2010cv00218
Petitioner:
Ben Alan Parichuk
Respondent:
SCI Dallas, Warren and Sussex County, New Jersey, Prosecutor's Offices and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01356
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
