Cases 1 - 10 of 366
JACKSON v. PETERSON et al
as 3:2024cv09205
Plaintiff:
JOELLE P. JACKSON
Defendant:
BENJAMIN CRANE, GEORGE PETERSON and JAMES KLESNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. MCGILL et al
as 2:2024cv06910
Defendant:
JOHN POMPONIO, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-4, PATRICIA MCGILL and others
Plaintiff:
WENDELL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AZCONA v. CAMDEN COUNTY DRUG COURT, et al
as 1:2024cv05644
Plaintiff:
DANIEL AZCONA
Defendant:
Camden County Drug Court, NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPT., N/DOC Staff Male and Female and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BAKER v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv05517
Petitioner:
JONATHAN P. BAKER
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
KING v. HARDDEN et al
as 1:2024cv05442
Plaintiff:
GARY MICHAEL KING
Defendant:
REV. P. HARDDEN, SGT. E. HEADLEY and KESHIA FISHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROMAN v. QUINLAN et al
as 1:2024cv05267
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL A. ROMAN
Defendant:
J. QUINLAN, HICKOCK, S. PRINCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TORRES v. JOHN DOE 1-3
as 1:2024cv04897
Plaintiff:
CHARLES P. TORRES
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORD v. MORRIS et al
as 1:2024cv00871
Plaintiff:
TODD C. FORD, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN P. MORRIS, DET. I.C.J. PILIGNO, A. LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HEMRIC, JR., v. THOMPSON
as 1:2023cv22634
Petitioner:
ALFRED P. HEMRIC, JR.,
Respondent:
RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MESADIEU v. THOMAS et al
as 2:2023cv21376
Plaintiff:
GUILIO MESADIEU
Defendant:
TANGERLA MICHELLE THOMAS, JOHN ESMERADO, KENNETH J. GRISPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
