Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 41
GARDNER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv04865
Defendant: MICHAEL NUTTER, JOHN MCNESBY, RAYMOND HARLEY and others
Plaintiff: ANTHONY GARDNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason Parker v. McClendon, et al
as 17-2956
Plaintiff - Appellant: JASON PARKER
Defendant - Appellee: PHILADELPHIA SHERIFF SERGEANT MCCLENDON, JUDGE RAYFORD A. MEANS, PHILADELPHIA SHERIFF MARCUS MORRIS, Sheriff and others
GIBSON v. STREET et. al.
as 2:2017cv01246
Plaintiff: JAMES GIBSON
Defendant: SIERRA THOMAS STREET
Thirdparty_defendant: RUFUS SETH WILLIAMS, RAYFORD MEANS and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. CASTELI et al
as 2:2016cv04148
Plaintiff: JASON PARKER
Defendant: CASTELI, BAKER, WILLIE GREENE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason Parker v. Rayford Means, et al
as 16-2090
Plaintiff - Appellant: JASON PARKER
Defendant - Appellee: RAYFORD A. MEANS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
PARKER v. BAKER et al
as 2:2016cv01608
Plaintiff: JASON PARKER
Defendant: BAKER, RAYFORD A. MEANS and JEWELL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. MEANS
as 2:2016cv01214
Petitioner: JASON PARKER
Respondent: RAYFORD A. MEANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PARKER v. MEANS
as 2:2016cv00899
Petitioner: JASON PARKER
Respondent: RAYFORD A. MEANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jason Parker v. Rayford Means, et al
as 15-3592
Plaintiff - Appellant: JASON PARKER
Defendant - Appellee: RAYFORD A. MEANS, IN THEIOR OFFICIAL INDIVIDUAL AND PRIVATE CAPACITIES, MCLENDON, LENORA CLAYTON and others
PARKER v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CLERK OF COURT et al
as 2:2015cv05681
Plaintiff: JASON PARKER
Defendant: MONTGOMERY COUNTY CLERK OF COURT, THOMAS M. DEL RICCI, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?