Cases 1 - 10 of 15
LOPEZ v. EDWARDS et al
as 2:2022cv04821
Plaintiff:
MR. CARLOS JOSE LOPEZ
Defendant:
RONALD P EDWARDS, MICHAEL CONRAD, WELLPATH MEDICAL DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILCOX v. CUMBERLAND CO. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al
as 1:2022cv04672
Plaintiff:
PERRY A. WILCOX
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND CO. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, EUGENE J. CALDWELL, II, CAPTAIN BRAGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORD v. CALDWELL et al
as 1:2022cv04500
Plaintiff:
MR. TODD C. FORD, JR.
Defendant:
EUGENE CALDWELL, OSCAR AVILLES, WELL PATH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARREDO v. HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv02122
Plaintiff:
RONNY RUBEN CARREDO
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONS, LT. DILLIE KEVIN, RONALD P. EDWARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. EDWARDS et al
as 2:2022cv01532
Plaintiff:
CURTIS JONES
Defendant:
RONALD P. EDWARDS and HERBERT SYMCEZK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BASKERVILLE v. COUNTY OF HUDSON et al
as 2:2022cv01023
Plaintiff:
EBN BASKERVILLE
Defendant:
COUNTY OF HUDSON, HCCF, THOMAS A. DEGISE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OJO v. HUDSON COUNTY et al
as 2:2021cv11360
Defendant:
RONALD P. EDWARDS, WOODLEY, D'ANDREA and others
Plaintiff:
OLUKAYODE DAVID OJO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZAPOLSKIS v. EDWARDS
as 2:2020cv11212
Respondent:
RONALD P. EDWARDS
Petitioner:
VLADISLAV ZAPOLSKIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FERRERA v. EDWARDS
as 2:2020cv01119
Petitioner:
JONATHAN FERRERA
Respondent:
DIRECTOR RONALD P. EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. HUGHES et al
as 3:2019cv21391
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN D. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BRIAN M. HUGHES, JOHN DOES 1-7 and RONALD P. EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
