Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HUGGINS v. AVILES et al
as 2:2023cv03726
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HUGGINS
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES, SGT BROWN, BECKY SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIORDANO v. VILACOBA et al
as 3:2022cv03294
Plaintiff:
DAVID GIORDANO
Defendant:
Lieutenant Vilacoba, MONMOUTH COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, OCEAN COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
WHATLEY v. EDNA MAHAN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 3:2020cv12295
Plaintiff:
LAUREN WHATLEY
Defendant:
SARA DAVIIS, CEOS & CHIEF EXECUTIVES, EDNA MAHAN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BYRD v. FINLEY et al
as 3:2019cv06879
Defendant:
SPECIAL AGENT MARK GILLEN, THE DAILY JORNAL VINELAND NEW JERSEY, DETECTIVE MICHAEL FRANSKO and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHAN BYRD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DRAKE v. SALUTI et al
as 2:2017cv02643
Plaintiff:
KEITH H. DRAKE
Defendant:
GERALD M. SALUTI, NED ROSENBERG, J.S.C, JANICE MASSARO, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GROHS v. FRATALONE, ET AL
as 2:2013cv07870
Plaintiff:
STEVEN GROHS
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER HOLMES, ANGEL L. SANTIAGO, ROBERT BUECHELE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BORNSTEIN et al v. COUNTY OF MONMOUTH et al
as 3:2011cv05336
Plaintiff:
ISRAEL BORNSTEIN
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, MONMOUTH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, MONMOUTH COUNTY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANIEL v. ZEA-ACUNA et al
as 3:2009cv05333
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EHUD EZRAN DANIEL
Defendant:
JENNY A. ZEA-ACUNA, SARA STURT, PETER A. ELMER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
HARRIS v. CORZINE et al
as 2:2007cv05475
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE HARRIS
Defendant:
JOHN S. CORZINE, ANNE MILGRAM, GEORGE HAYMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
