Cases 1 - 10 of 16
JONES v. GANSKY et al
as 2:2023cv02967
Plaintiff:
MACK JONES
Defendant:
JOSEPH GANSKY, JOSEPH GEORGE, MATTHEW TOBIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snyder v. Warden of Franklin County Jail et al
as 4:2021cv01095
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Warden of Franklin County Jail
Petitioner:
Toby Wayne Snyder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
IN RE: DAVID T. SHULICK
as 2:2019cv03290
Petitioner:
DAVID T. SHULICK and TOBI GLATT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Speraw v. Catone et al
as 1:2018cv02310
Defendant:
Shanna Cox, Gary Eichelberger, Toby Catone and others
Plaintiff:
David Nelson Speraw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fatir v. Coupe et al
as 1:2016cv00939
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir
Defendant:
Robert Coupe, Perry Phelps, Chris Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fatir v. Coupe et al
as 1:2016cv00315
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir
Defendant:
Robert Coupe, Perry Phelps, Chris Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY et al
as 3:2015cv07102
Plaintiff:
ALAN MURPHY
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY, EDMUND CICCHI, CHRISTOPHER BELINSKY and others
Cross_claimant:
BRIAN FAVRETTO and DOUGLAS TURNER
Cross_defendant:
BRIAN FAVRETTO , DOUGLAS TURNER , JOHN BARTLINSKI, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER-SMART v. BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2015cv00210
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TUCKER-SMART
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, BEN SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT, GANSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WOOTEN v. WALSH
as 2:2013cv07347
Petitioner:
TOBY WOOTEN
Respondent:
JEROME WALSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Toby v. Lamas et al
as 3:2013cv02882
Petitioner:
Dennis Toby
Respondent:
Marirosa Lamas and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
