Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02665
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv06184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00051
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
LIN v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT et al
as 2:2008cv02606
Petitioner:
TI ZENG LIN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MICHAEL MUKASEY and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SINGH v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT et al
as 2:2007cv05564
Petitioner:
BHUPINDER SINGH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MICHAEL MUKASEY and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00934
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00683
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
