Cases 1 - 10 of 31
WATSON v. MERCER COUNTY et al
as 3:2023cv23318
Plaintiff:
Mr. Khalief Watson and KALEIF WATSON
Defendant:
MERCER COUNTY, MERCER COUNTY CORRECTION CENTER, MERCER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VILLAFANA v. CHARLES et al
as 2:2023cv04374
Plaintiff:
YASIN VILLAFANA
Defendant:
RONALD L. CHARLES, WATSON JR., CORNICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATSON v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX et al
as 1:2020cv15636
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Plaintiff:
YAHYA WATSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ISOM v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2019cv19601
Plaintiff:
MARTESS ISOM and Gary Hodges
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, SARGEANT'S ROBERTS, JACK ISABELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUNTER v. IBE et al
as 1:2018cv12543
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-3, CHIGOZIE IBE, IDC, BURLEW, R&D and others
Plaintiff:
MALCOLM HUNTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BELT v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2017cv13582
Plaintiff:
JERRY RAY BELT
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, NORTHEAST REGIONAL DIRECTOR, NORTHEAST REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
RUSSO v. THOMPKINS et al
as 2:2017cv07466
Plaintiff:
JAMES M RUSSO
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER THOMPKINS, ROBIN WATSON and YATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANNS v. SIMS et al
as 1:2017cv03815
Plaintiff:
KENNETH A. MANNS
Defendant:
T. SIMS, T. HOEY, RAVI SOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATSON v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv08520
Plaintiff:
DONTRAE WATSON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATSON v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONS
as 1:2016cv07112
Plaintiff:
DANTE MARCLE WATSON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
