Cases 101 - 110 of 133
PEREZ v. KEPHART et al
as 3:2013cv00269
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
DAVID KEPHART, TIMOTHY KEPHART, KEPHART TRUCKING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Perez v. Clark et al
as 1:2013cv02949
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Thomas A. Clark, Central Pennsylvania Pulmonary Associates, LLC and Central Pennsylvania Pulmonary Associates, LLC 401(k) Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
PEREZ v. JAMES R. MACAULEY INC. et al
as 1:2013cv07341
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
JAMES R. MACAULEY INC. and GEORGE MACAULEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PEREZ v. COMMANDER CARBON SALARY SAVINGS PLAN
as 2:2013cv06791
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
COMMANDER CARBON SALARY SAVINGS PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
PEREZ et al v. GARDEN STATE GROWERS LLC et al
as 3:2013cv05853
Plaintiff:
ARMANDO PEREZ and ISAHAC SERNA MARTINEZ
Defendant:
GARDEN STATE GROWERS LLC and ROY DEN HOLLANDER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PEREZ v. BILLA CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05671
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
BILLA CORPORATION and SANTOKH SINGH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PEREZ v. MCCUTCHIN et al
as 2:2013cv05492
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
SAMUEL MCCUTCHIN, CYNTHIA LINDENMAN, SNYDER HEATING COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
PEREZ v. RAMSBURG et al
as 2:2013cv05073
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
THOMAS RAMSBURG , TMR, INC. and TMR, INC. 401(K) PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Perez et al v. Hirst et al
as 1:2013cv01466
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez , Secretary of Labor and United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
Michael Hirst, Peg Hirst, Progressive Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
PEREZ v. ORSUTO et al
as 1:2013cv04959
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
RAYMOND ORSUTO, 800 WEST SALON, INC. and 800 WEST SALON, INC. RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
