Labor Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 20
PENSION FUND FOR NURSING HOME AND HEALTH CARE EMPLOYEES - PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY et al v. MORRISON MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST, INC.
as 2:2012cv02610
Plaintiff: PENSION FUND FOR NURSING HOME AND HEALTH CARE EMPLOYEES - PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY and SUE O'NEILL
Defendant: MORRISON MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
NEW JERSEY REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS AND NEW JERSEY CARPENTERS FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF v. CARPENTRY SPECIALISTS, INC
as 2:2012cv02066
Petitioner: NEW JERSEY REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS AND NEW JERSEY CARPENTERS FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF
Respondent: CARPENTRY SPECIALISTS, INC
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
PLUMBERS LOCAL NO. 24 PENSION FUND et al v. S.L. ASHTON CONSTRUCTION SPECIALIST, INC.
as 3:2011cv03700
Plaintiff: PLUMBERS LOCAL NO. 24 PENSION FUND , PLUMBERS LOCAL NO. 24 WELFARE FUND , PLUMBERS LOCAL NO. 24 ANNUITY FUND and others
Defendant: S.L. ASHTON CONSTRUCTION SPECIALIST, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
LABORERS' COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA , AS AGENT FOR PHILIP AMERIS, AND JOHN C. BUSSE, TRUSTEES AD LITEM, LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS v. USA CONCRETE SPECIALISTS, INC.
as 2:2011cv00523
Plaintiff: LABORERS' COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA , AS AGENT FOR PHILIP AMERIS, AND JOHN C. BUSSE, TRUSTEES AD LITEM, LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA WELFARE AND PENSION
Defendant: USA CONCRETE SPECIALISTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Millwrights and Machinery Erectors Local Union 1545 Pension Plan et al v. Premcor Refining Group Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00290
Plaintiff: Millwrights and Machinery Erectors Local Union 1545 Pension Plan , Millwrights and Machinery Erectors Local Union 1545 Pension Fund and David G. Costello
Defendant: Premcor Refining Group Inc., Valero Energy Corporation, Emlyn Construction Company and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS, ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY AND 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN v. ELEVATOR SPECIALIST, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv00501
Plaintiff: TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS, ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY AND 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN and TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS, ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY AND 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN
Defendant: ELEVATOR SPECIALIST, INC., NONDI LUTHER and TONYA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
SHIELDS v. AMERICAN MERCHANDISING SPECIALISTS, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00891
Plaintiff: MARK SHIELDS
Defendant: AMERICAN MERCHANDISING SPECIALISTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Type: Labor Plaintiff
NEW JERSEY CARPENTERS FUNDS et al v. DRYWALL & ACOUSTICAL SPECIALISTS INC.
as 2:2009cv02645
Petitioner: NEW JERSEY CARPENTERS FUNDS, NEW JERSEY REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS and ZAZZALI, FAGELLA, NOWAK, KLEINBAUM & FRIEDMAN, P.C.
Respondent: DRYWALL & ACOUSTICAL SPECIALISTS INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Type: Labor None
NEW JERSEY CARPENTERS FUNDS et al v. DRYWALL & ACOUSTICAL SPECIALISTS, INC.
as 2:2008cv02735
Petitioner: NEW JERSEY CARPENTERS FUNDS, NEW JERSEY REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS and ZAZZALI, FAGELLA, NOWAK, KLEINBAUM & FREIDMAN, P.C.
Respondent: DRYWALL & ACOUSTICAL SPECIALISTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
Pappa v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 3:2007cv00708
Plaintiff: Cheryl Pappa
Defendant: UNUM Life Insurance Company of America, UnumProvident Corporation, International Claims Specialists, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?