Cases 21 - 26 of 26
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS, ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY AND 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN v. PEAK ELEVATOR PERFORMANCE GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv03406
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS, ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY AND 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN
Defendant:
PEAK ELEVATOR PERFORMANCE GROUP, INC., RANDALL MCGINNIS, JAMES F. MCGINNIS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
ABRAMOWICH et al v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 3:2011cv00109
Plaintiff:
JOE J. ABRAMOWICH, JR. , JAMES F. CHEEK , GEORGE FRIEDLINE and others
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. and BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
GIRGIS v. THE HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv05279
Plaintiff:
MARK GIRGIS
Defendant:
THE HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, RANDALL FOOD MARKETS, INC. and RANDALL'S FOOD MARKETS, INC., LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
STIVENSON v. RETIREMENT PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY
as 2:2009cv00368
Plaintiff:
RANDALL G. STIVENSON
Defendant:
RETIREMENT PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SHRUM et al v. U.S. AIRWAYS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv04437
Plaintiff:
KENNETH SHRUM, KENNETH SHRUM, KENNETH SHRUM and others
Defendant:
U.S. AIRWAYS, INC. and AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Altland et al v. York County Transportation Authority
as 1:2007cv01431
Plaintiff:
Laurie D. Altland, Laurie D. Altland, Diedra Y. Bare and others
Defendant:
York County Transportation Authority
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
