Cases 31 - 38 of 38
BILLS v. PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2008cv01824
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS S. BILLS
Defendant:
PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
COTO v. UNUM PROVIDENT et al
as 2:2008cv01474
Plaintiff:
SLAVICA COTO
Defendant:
UNUM PROVIDENT and FIRST UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCCULLOUGH v. FIRST UNUM PROVIDENT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2008cv00197
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MCCULLOUGH
Defendant:
FIRST UNUM PROVIDENT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
LEIBUNDGUT v. PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2007cv03844
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH LEIBUNDGUT
Defendant:
PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
MITCHELL et al v. APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv02915
Plaintiff:
GILBERT MITCHELL, CHRISTOPHER ALBERTSON, MARK ANKNER and others
Defendant:
APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY, AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P. and NHP MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
KIRSCHENSTEIN v. UNUM PROVIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2007cv02791
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH P. KIRSCHENSTEIN
Defendant:
UNUM PROVIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
DOUGHERTY v. UNUMPROVIDENT CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv00840
Plaintiff:
EDWARD J. DOUGHERTY
Defendant:
UNUMPROVIDENT CORPORATION, FIRST UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
WILDER v. DMR TECHNICAL GROUP, et al
as 3:2002cv00879
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE V. WILDER, SR.
Defendant:
DMR TECHNICAL GROUP, AT&T, UNUM PROVIDENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
