Labor Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 72
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 98 et al v. CHISOM ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, INC.
as 2:2009cv02793
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 98, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 PENSION PLAN and others
Defendant: CHISOM ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Type: Labor None
IBEW LOCAL NO. 56 VACATION FUND et al v. NORTHWEST SERVICE COMPANY
as 1:2009cv00116
Plaintiff: IBEW LOCAL NO. 56 VACATION FUND, NATIONAL LABOR MANAGEMENT COOPERATIVE COUNCIL, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL BENEFIT FUND and others
Defendant: NORTHWEST SERVICE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type: Labor None
IBEW LOCAL NO. 56 VACATION FUND et al v. WADSWORTH ELECTRIC CO. et al
as 1:2009cv00069
Plaintiff: IBEW LOCAL NO. 56 VACATION FUND, NATIONAL LABOR MANAGEMENT COOPERATIVE COUNCIL, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL BENEFIT FUND and others
Defendant: WADSWORTH ELECTRIC CO. and WADSWORTH ELECTRIC, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
IBEW LOCAL UNION NO. 400 et al v. ROSATO ELECTRIC, INC.
as 3:2009cv01114
Plaintiff: IBEW LOCAL UNION NO. 400, IBEW LOCAL 400 WELFARE, PENSION, ANNUITY AND JOINT APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING FUNDS AND THEIR BOARDS OF TRUSTEES and IBEW LOCAL 400 DISTRIBUTION FUND FOR ITSELF AND AS COLLECTION AGENT FOR THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL BENEFIT FUND
Defendant: ROSATO ELECTRIC, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
IBEW LOCAL UNION NO. 102 et al v. P.J. SMITH ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS,INC.
as 2:2009cv00974
Plaintiff: IBEW LOCAL UNION NO. 102, IBEW LOCAL 102 WELFARE,PENSION, ANNUITY AND JOINT APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING FUNDS AND THEIR BOARDS OF TRUSTEES and IBEW LOCAL 102 DISTRIBUTION FUND AS COLLECTION AGENT FOR THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL BENEFIT FUND
Defendant: P.J. SMITH ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS,INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Type: Labor None
IBEW LOCAL NO. 56 VACATION FUND et al v. THAYER POWER AND COMMUNICATION LINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2008cv00270
Plaintiff: IBEW LOCAL NO. 56 VACATION FUND, NATIONAL LABOR MANAGEMENT COOPERATIVE COUNCIL, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL BENEFIT FUND and others
Defendant: THAYER POWER AND COMMUNICATION LINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
IBEW LOCAL UNION NO. 102 et al v. ELECTRO-JET ELECTRIC
as 2:2008cv04786
Plaintiff: IBEW LOCAL UNION NO. 102, IBEW LOCAL UNION NO. 102 WELFARE, PENSION, ANNUITY FUNDS AND THEIR BOARD OF TRUSTEES and IBEW LOCAL 102 DISTRIBUTION FUND AS COLLECTION AGENT FOR THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL BENEFIT FUND
Defendant: ELECTRO-JET ELECTRIC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
IBEW LOCAL NO. 56 VACATION FUND et al v. DWAYNE COOPER ENTERPRISES
as 1:2008cv00226
Plaintiff: IBEW LOCAL NO. 56 VACATION FUND, NATIONAL LABOR MANAGEMENT COOPERATIVE COUNCIL, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL BENEFIT FUND and others
Defendant: DWAYNE COOPER ENTERPRISES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
IBEW LOCAL UNION NO. 102 et al v. MERJO ELECTRIC CORP.
as 3:2008cv02921
Plaintiff: IBEW LOCAL UNION NO. 102, IBEW LOCAL 102 WELFARE, PENSION, ANNUITY AND JOINT APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING FUNDS AND THEIR BOARDS OF TRUSTEES and IBEW LOCAL 102 DISTRIBUTION FUND AS COLLECTION AGENT FOR THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL BENEFIT FUND
Defendant: MERJO ELECTRIC CORP.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
IBEW LOCAL NO. 56 VACATION FUND et al v. WADSWORTH ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 1:2008cv00058
Plaintiff: IBEW LOCAL NO. 56 VACATION FUND, NATIONAL LABOR MANAGEMENT COOPERATIVE COUNCIL, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL BENEFIT FUND and others
Defendant: WADSWORTH ELECTRIC CO. and WADSWORTH ELECTRIC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?