Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Danny Valentine Shabazz v. Chris Bruce, et al
as 24-1919
Defendant:
CERRON CADE, JOHN CARNEY, CHRIS BRUCE and others
Plaintiff:
DANNY AMEN VALENTINE SHABAZZ
SHABAZZ v. BRUCE et al
as 2:2024cv01854
Plaintiff:
DANNY AMEN ANDERSON VALENTINE SHABAZZ
Defendant:
CHRIS BRUCE, CERRON CADE, JEFF FLYNN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
FLYNN v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 2:2022cv02396
Plaintiff:
JAIME FLYNN
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA and UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
FLYNN v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 2:2020cv05310
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Plaintiff:
FRANK FLYNN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
BARTOS v. SIGNATURE SYSTEMS INC. et al
as 2:2018cv02086
Plaintiff:
BRIAN BARTOS
Defendant:
SIGNATURE SYSTEMS INC. , RAYMOND FLYNN , CHRISTOPHER MCNUTT and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
RODRIGUEZ v. GENSERVE, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv02641
Plaintiff:
MARIO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
GENSERVE, INC., GENERATOR HOLDING CORPORATION, ROBERT FORTUNATO and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
BANZ v. SIGNATURE SYSTEMS INC. et al
as 2:2013cv06436
Plaintiff:
ADAM BANZ
Defendant:
SIGNATURE SYSTEMS INC. and RAYMOND FLYNN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
GRAHN v. SIGNATURE SYSTEMS INC. et al
as 2:2013cv05629
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER GRAHN
Defendant:
SIGNATURE SYSTEMS INC. and RAYMOND FLYNN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PATRICELLI v. SIGNATURE SYSTEMS INC. et al
as 2:2013cv01571
Plaintiff:
LARRY PATRICELLI
Defendant:
SIGNATURE SYSTEMS INC. and RAYMOND FLYNN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
FLYNN FLOORS, INC. v. METROPOLITAN REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS
as 2:2010cv03364
Plaintiff:
FLYNN FLOORS, INC.
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
