Cases 1 - 8 of 8
BAMBLING v. ROCKLAND MANUFACTURING AND EQUIPMENT LOCK
as 3:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
RYAN BAMBLING
Defendant:
ROCKLAND MANUFACTURING AND EQUIPMENT LOCK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
SNYDER v. U LOCK INC
as 2:2021cv00904
Defendant:
U LOCK INC and U-LOCK INC
Plaintiff:
SHANNI SNYDER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
TEWELDE v. POP A LOCK OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY
as 2:2020cv00036
Defendant:
POP A LOCK OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY
Plaintiff:
RAPHAEL TEWELDE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
KALAN et al v. FARMERS & MERCHANTS TRUST COMPANY OF CHAMBERSBURG et al
as 2:2015cv01435
Plaintiff:
HARVEY KALAN, M.D. , THE HARVEY KALAN, M.D., INC. EMPLOYEE WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN , PAMELA K. ERDMAN, M.D. and others
Defendant:
FARMERS & MERCHANTS TRUST COMPANY OF CHAMBERSBURG, LAWRENCE KORESKO, KORESKO FINANCIAL, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
HOON v. NATUREX INC.
as 2:2010cv04370
Plaintiff:
JEAN-DOMINIQUE LOCK WAH HOON
Defendant:
NATUREX INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PUCCI et al v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION et al
as 2:2010cv01062
Plaintiff:
THOMAS PUCCI , SHARON E. TAYLOR , PETER CAMPBELL and others
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION, THE ASSOCIATION OF PENNSYLVANIA STATE COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY FACULTIES (APSCUF), CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
TEANECK POLICEMEN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION LOCAL 215 et al v. TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK
as 2:2009cv06339
Plaintiff:
TEANECK POLICEMEN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION LOCAL 215, GERARD ROSANO, JOHN ABRAHAM and others
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
HETHERINGTON et al v. NORTH VERSAILLES TOWNSHIP
as 2:2009cv00323
Plaintiff:
MARK HETHERINGTON, DAVID C. REICHE, TRAVIS M. POMAIBO and others
Defendant:
NORTH VERSAILLES TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
