Cases 1 - 9 of 9
THARPE v. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC.
as 2:2020cv13267
Plaintiff:
JAJUAN THARPE
Defendant:
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
DOWE v. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC.
as 2:2018cv00429
Plaintiff:
MERCEDES DOWE
Defendant:
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
NORTH JERSEY BRAIN & SPINE CENTER v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE CO. et al
as 2:2016cv01797
Plaintiff:
NORTH JERSEY BRAIN & SPINE CENTER
Defendant:
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE CO. , AETNA HEALTH INC. , CREATIVE MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Duffy v. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC.
as 3:2015cv01427
Defendant:
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC.
Plaintiff:
RYAN DUFFY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rosul v. Securitas Security Services USA Inc.
as 1:2012cv01587
Plaintiff:
Grant Rosul
Defendant:
Securitas Security Services USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
HEIMBERGER v. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA INC. et al
as 2:2012cv03055
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HEIMBERGER
Defendant:
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA INC., STRATEGIC RESOURCE COMPANY and AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Friolet et al v. Securitas Security Services USA Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00667
Plaintiff:
Earl L. Friolet, Sr. and Teirace P. Friolet
Defendant:
Securitas Security Services USA Inc. and Gerald E. Walters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILLIAMS et al v. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA INC.
as 2:2010cv07181
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE WILLIAMS and KIMBERLY ORD
Defendant:
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
THE ESTATE OF SHELLIE L. MARDAK v. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC.
as 2:2008cv00535
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF SHELLIE L. MARDAK
Defendant:
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
