Cases 91 - 100 of 245
Stephen Downer v. Charles Warren, et al
as 13-2974
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN DOWNER
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES WARREN and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
SEABROOKS v. WARREN et al
as 3:2013cv03703
Petitioner:
EUGENE SEABROOKS
Respondent:
CHARLES WARREN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEWIS v. WARREN et al
as 3:2013cv03705
Petitioner:
MALVERN L. LEWIS
Respondent:
CHARLES WARREN and JEFFREY CHIESA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tormu Prall v. Supreme Court, et al
as 13-2313
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION NEW JERSEY, SUPERIOR COURT and others
NICHOLS v. WARREN, et al.
as 1:2013cv02897
Petitioner:
DAVON NICHOLS
Respondent:
CHARLES WARREN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TUCKER v. WARREN
as 3:2013cv02908
Petitioner:
MICHAEL TUCKER
Respondent:
CHARLES WARREN, JR. and ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STEVENS v. WARREN et al
as 2:2013cv02831
Petitioner:
ANTIONE STEVENS
Respondent:
CHARLES WARREN and JEFFREY CHIESA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carnell Gibbs v. Greg Bartkowski, et al
as 13-2242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARNELL GIBBS
Defendant - Appellee:
GREG BARTKOWSKI, ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and CHARLES WARREN
SAUNDERS v. WARREN et al
as 2:2013cv02794
Petitioner:
AL-MUTAH SAUNDERS
Respondent:
CHARLES WARREN and JEFFREY S. CHIESA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LYGA v. WARREN
as 3:2013cv02657
Petitioner:
MIKE LYGA
Respondent:
CHARLES WARREN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
