Cases 101 - 110 of 114
HEYSE et al v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv05965
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN HEYSE and EDWARD HEYSE
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC., ALBERTSONS, INC. and SUPERVALU, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SUPERVALU INC. v. ELMER I.G.A., INC. et al
as 1:2008cv06141
Plaintiff:
SUPERVALU INC.
Defendant:
ELMER I.G.A., INC., SUPER VALUE MANAGEMENT, INC., RICHARD SCHMIDT and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCGORRY et al v. SUPERVALU, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv05344
Plaintiff:
THERESA MARIE MCGORRY and ROBERT MCGORRY
Defendant:
SUPERVALU, INC., ACME MARKETS, INC. and ALBERTSON'S INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv04920
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
BRIGNOLA et al v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv04172
Plaintiff:
MARYGRACE BRIGNOLA and MICHAEL BRIGNOLA
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC., ALBERTSONS, INC. and SUPERVALU, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MACK v. MORAN FOODS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv03767
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA MACK
Defendant:
MORAN FOODS, INC. and SUPERVALUE, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TOTAL BUILDINGS SERVICES, INC. v. SUPERVALU INC.
as 2:2008cv03022
Plaintiff:
TOTAL BUILDINGS SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
SUPERVALU INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SAMERO et al v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv02974
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH SAMERO and JOANN SAMERO
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC., ALBERTSONS, INC. and SUPERVALU, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
GILLIARD v. MORAN FOODS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv04615
Plaintiff:
RENAE GILLIARD
Defendant:
MORAN FOODS, INC., SUPERVALUE INC. and SAVE-A-LOT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
