Cases 101 - 110 of 664
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND et al v. NEW SIGN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv02910
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 ZONE 2 PENSION PLAN and LOCAL UNION 98 OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS
Defendant:
RONALD BRODIE, NEW SIGN INDUSTRIES, INC. and NW SIGN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
LOCAL UNION NO. 164, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO AND IBEW LOCAL 164 BENEFIT FUNDS v. MERCHANT ELECTRIC AND LIGHTING SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2019cv12819
Petitioner:
LOCAL UNION NO. 164, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO AND IBEW LOCAL 164 BENEFIT FUNDS
Respondent:
MERCHANT ELECTRIC AND LIGHTING SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
LOCAL UNION NO. 456 IBEW, AFL-CIO, et al. v. OFFSHORE ELECTRIC, INC.
as 2:2019cv12735
Petitioner:
LOCAL UNION NO. 456 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO and LOCAL 456 IBEW EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUNDS
Respondent:
OFFSHORE ELECTRIC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
ZUPPA v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL 102 (469)
as 2:2019cv12507
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ZUPPA
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL 102 (469), ABC, INC. and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
GRAPHIC COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS NATIONAL PENSION FUND et al v. MONTCO ADVERTISING SPECIALTIES, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv02013
Defendant:
MONTCO ADVERTISING SPECIALTIES, INC. and MICHAEL LORAH
Plaintiff:
GRAPHIC COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS NATIONAL PENSION FUND, GEORGE TEDESCHI and MALCOLM PRITZKER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL UNION 269 et al v. LINCOLN WAY ELECTRIC, INC.
as 3:2019cv12176
Petitioner:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 269 ANNUITY FUND, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 269 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL INDUSTRY FUND, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 269 JATC FUND and others
Respondent:
LINCOLN WAY ELECTRIC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
TRUSTEES OF THE IBEW LOCAL 400 WELFARE FUND et al v. MERCHANT ELECTRICAL & LIGHTING SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2019cv09226
Plaintiff:
IBEW LOCAL 400 WELFARE FUND, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION 400, IBEW LOCAL 400 ANNUITY FUND and others
Defendant:
MERCHANT ELECTRICAL & LIGHTING SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND et al v. MBR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. et al
as 5:2019cv01413
Defendant:
MBR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. and BRENDAN FIELD
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 PROFIT SHARING PLAN, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 ZONE 2 PENSION PLAN, ELECTRICAL WORKERS JOINT APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING TRUST FUND and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 654 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND et al v. EAST GOSHEN ELECTRICAL, INC.
as 2:2019cv00210
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 654 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, PAUL MULLEN and INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 654 PENSION FUND
Defendant:
EAST GOSHEN ELECTRICAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL 863 v. CONSOLIDATED SERVICE DISTRIBUTORS, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00194
Defendant:
MARK LEFKOWITZ and CONSOLIDATED SERVICE DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL 863
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
