Cases 131 - 140 of 169
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC v. MCCANN et al
as 1:2015cv03333
Plaintiff:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
Defendant:
ELLEN MCCANN, ESTATE OF ELLEN MCCANN, ALVIN D. BETHUNE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
RAPPAPORT et al v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC et al
as 2:2015cv03314
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B. RAPPAPORT and AVIVA S. RAPPAPORT
Defendant:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC , CHRISTINA GARZA and JOHN DOES (1-10)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ANDRESS et al v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv01779
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY ANDRESS and GEORGE ANDRESS
Defendant:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC , BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
DEVINE v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
as 2:2015cv01361
Plaintiff:
EDWARD DEVINE
Defendant:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
REED v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
as 2:2015cv00349
Plaintiff:
PHILLIPS C. REED, II
Defendant:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
STRICKLEN v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC
as 2:2015cv01115
Plaintiff:
TOSHIBA STRICKLEN
Defendant:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00079
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv02500
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
CORTELLESSA et al v. UDREN LAW OFFICES P.C. et al
as 2:2014cv07250
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL F. CORTELLESSA and ERIN E. CORTELLESSA
Defendant:
UDREN LAW OFFICES P.C., MARK UDREN, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv07801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
